I recently had an issue where a client's Microsoft Exchange 2010 server failed the best practices analyzer due to an "Database backup critical" error. I was confused at first since I had a fully functional wbadmin scripted backup that I could see backed up Exchange. Only after fiddling for a while did I discover the missing parameter I had to provide before exchange indicated a successful database backup and subsequently cleared out all the thousands of database log files it kept:
wbadmin start backup -backupTarget:\\1.2.3.4\backups -include:c: ^
-user:msbackup -password:"password" -quiet -allCritical -vssFull -systemState
Without -systemState this never worked.
…when you look up close at about 100x magnification with polarized light:

Here they are at almost 5x life size:
…if you do not have a VERY fast internet connection, this will be a huge pain. I rebooted, started the onboard OS Reinstall process and it went ahead downloading Lion… With my connection this works:

But imagine that over a 384kbps ADSL line...
I recently had a client that needed to replace a hard drive in a Linux FakeRaid RAID5 array using dmraid. The process is very unintuitive:
run
dmraid -a yThis will activate the raid set and should start the rebuild process. In my case this did not persist after reboot, hence /dev/mapper did not show the partition table. The solution was to rebuild the initrd image:
uname -a
mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.img.NEW 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5uname -a was used to identify the correct kernel. Obviously you need to update grub with the new image. Reboot otherwise you will not see the partitions on the mapper device to mount.
For some reason the whole ext3 filesystem was corrupted. I had to recreate the filesystem and rebuild the data from scratch. Not sure if it is FakeRaid's fault, or whether I made a mistake. But it certainly did not boost my confidence in software based RAID.
I recently bought my daughter a Canon PowerShot SX40 HS camera for Christmas, call it an early present. Being an amateur photographer myself, it was inevitable that going out and buying a camera - even though not for me - would not have been a trivial exercise.
If it was me, I would never have purchased this camera. Anyone with more than 3 neurons will tell you that a camera with a 35x optical zoom lens (24mm - 840mm) will show significant amounts of aberrations, and with a tiny 1/2.3" CMOS sensor noise will be a problem, as well as dynamic range and colour depth.
However, my daughter seemed to like the way the camera holds in her hands, that it felt like a "real" camera and the zoom lens appealed to her. So… I bought it. Was about $430 if I remember correctly. Quite expensive for a Christmas present...