Deductive reasoning refers to the process where one derives a conclusion (C)
starting with a known (or assumed) set of premises (P). An example may
illustrate this better:
P: Assume all men will die someday
P: Assume bin Laden is a man
C: bin Laden will die someday
This deductive step was based on the logical principle that if A implies B,
and A is true, then B is true.
Deductive reasoning can fail. This is seen in the following famous paradox:
Let
a = b
Thus,
a2 = ab
a2 + a2 = a2 + ab
2a2 = a2 + ab
2a2 - 2ab = a2 + ab - 2ab
2a2 - 2ab = a2 - ab
Rewrite this as:
2(a2 - ab) = 1(a2 - ab)
Dividing both sides by (a2 - ab) gives:
2 = 1
QED.
See the problem with this line of reasoning? This is a very good example that one cannot apply deductive reasoning blindly for mathematical proofs.
Hint: Substitute the original assumption back into the numerator...
Another, much more subtle example is given below. See if you can find the error made in the reasoning:
![]() |
(1) |
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
(3) |
![]() |
(4) |
![]() |
(5) |
![]() |
(6) |
![]() |
(7) |
![]() |
(8) |
![]() |
(9) |
Which reduces to (Adding terms)QED. |
|
|
Hint: Do not make any assumptions about algebra other than those you have explicitly seen proofs for. Or mail and ask me :) |
|









(Adding terms)
Leave a comment